Ether andMagnetic field
 Galileo andEinsteinare wrong
 EquivalencePrinciple
 Ether andEquivalencePrinciple
 TECHNOLOGYFusion:The “ZEUS”machine

THE MISTAKES OF EINSTEIN
RECAPITULATION
Basic questions

The Theory of Relativity (Special and General) is proven, both in theory and experimentally, to be a completely false theory of Physics, and this – as today¢s “great” University Professors, etc, finally need to understand – is because:

Á. IN THEORY:

1. According to experiment – 14 (The experiment of the Gyroscope, see www.tsolkas.gr) and based on the laws of the gyroscope, it can be proven in theory, and in a very simple way (without actually performing any experiments), that the “equivalence principle»” of the General Theory of Relativity is a completely false principle of Physics.
Comment 1:
The above case (1) is truly comi-tragic because:
Unfortunately, the various relativists (University Professors, etc) cannot, or do not want to understand this very “simple fact” (which even a Physics student with a basic knowledge of the Theory of Relativity could grasp).
I would, therefore, like to ask the various relativists (University Professors, etc):
Question: Based on experiment – 14 (The experiment of the Gyroscope), is the “equivalence principle” of the General Theory of Relativity correct or wrong (Yes or No)?
We would very much like an answer from those relativists (University Professors, etc).
Could the above relativists (University Professors, etc) please answer this very simple question?
 Einstein¢s mistakeAs is well known, in the General Theory of Relativity and based on the «equivalence principle», Einstein claims that:The Equivalence Principle: “A homogenous field of gravitational forces with intensity g is always equivalent to a homogenous field of inertial forces with acceleration ã, (ã = g)”. Simply put, Einstein, on the basis of the “equivalence principle”, claims that: An experiment performed within a homogenous field of gravitational forces with intensity g, and the same experiment performed within a homogenous field of inertial forces with acceleration ã (ã = g), produce identical results. According, however, to the “experiment of the gyroscope” (see experiment – 14 at www.tsolkas.gr), what Einstein claims regarding the “equivalence principle” is completely false, because:In the “experiment of the gyroscope” (experiment – 14), the gyroscope yields different results 1) In a homogenous field of gravitational forces with intensity g, and 2) In a homogenous field of inertial forces with acceleration ã, (ã = g).In other words, the gyroscope never yields the same results in the above cases (1) and (2), as Einstein mistakenly claims, according to the “equivalence principle”. Therefore, based on the “experiment of the gyroscope”, it is proven, beyond any doubt, that the “equivalence principle” is a completely false principle of Physics, and is not valid in Nature. This is (among many others) Einstein¢s big mistake regarding the “equivalence principle”.
2. Based exclusively on Newton¢s laws, it can be proven that:
Planet Mercury¢s (and other planets¢) perihelion shift is not caused by the curvature of space-time around the sun (as Einstein mistakenly claims in the General Theory of Relativity); the true cause of Planet Mercury¢s (and other planets¢) perihelion shift is the revolution of the Sun around the centre of mass of our Solar System (see “Planet Mercury¢s shift” at www.tsolkas.gr).
Comment 2: In this case, I would like to ask the various relativists (University Professors, etc) the following question:
Question: Why won¢t the various relativists (University Professors, etc) reveal the extent of Planet Mercury¢s perihelion shift, which is caused by the revolution of the Sun around the centre of mass of our Solar System?
If the above relativists (University Professors, etc) were to answer the question and tell us the extent of Planet Mercury¢s perihelion shift, which is caused by the revolution of the Sun around the centre of mass of our Solar System, they would immediately see for themselves that the General Theory of Relativity is false.
We are, therefore, waiting for the above relativists (University Professors, etc) to present their calculations by which they work out the extent of Planet Mercury¢s perihelion shift, which is caused by the revolution of the Sun around the centre of mass of our Solar System. Why won¢t they share those calculations?
We are waiting for their answer.
Therefore, based on what we discussed above in paragraphs (1) and (2), it is proven, beyond any doubt, that the General Theory of Relativity is completely false.

B. EXPERIMENTALLY:

Based on the results drawn from performing:
1. The “experiment of the moving electrical charge” (experiment – 21).
2. The “experiment of light propagation within an inertial reference frame” (experiment – 22),

Postulate II (and, therefore, Postulate I) of the Special Theory of Relativity is false.

Therefore, based on what we discussed above in paragraphs (1) and (2), it is experimentally proven, beyond any doubt, that the Special Theory of Relativity is completely false.

Comment 3: Unfortunately, what today¢s “great” Physicists cannot seem to grasp (and which I am genuinely sorry about) is that:
Apart from the results of the two experiments listed above, (1) and (2), which prove that the Special Theory of Relativity is false, if:
Classic experiments, such as those by Michelson – Morley, Fresnel, Fizeau, Mascart – Jamin, Trouton – Noble, Cedarholm – Townes, etc, were to be performed on a vehicle moving at high speed, e.g. a car, train, airplane, space shuttle, etc, then the existence of Ether in Nature would be immediately proven.
Note:
Personally, out of the above experiments, I would choose the Cedarholm – Townes experiment. Unfortunately, however, today¢s “great” Physicists cannot (or will not) understand this very “simple fact” I am putting forward.
In short, I honestly cannot comprehend this (intentional?) and anti-scientific omission of theirs – not performing the above experiments in the way I propose (i.e. on a moving vehicle).
Because: All the above relativists (University Professors, etc) will not perform the above experiments (in the way that I propose, and which (experiments) are simple to perform and cost very little), but they perform, instead, various costly, complicated and “senseless” experiments, such as the failed Gravity Probe b experiment!!!, and numerous others. I think my confusion is justified.
Thus, based on what we discussed above, in paragraphs (A) and (B), (A. IN THEORY and B. EXPERIMENTALLY), it is proven, beyond any doubt, that the Theory of Relativity, in its entirety (Special and General) is a completely false Theory of Physics.

Conclusion

Everything that we discussed above, in paragraphs (A) and (B), mark, once and for all and irrevocably, the end of the Theory of Relativity (Special and General), and of that I am absolutely certain.

EPILOGUE

Following what we discussed in this project (and the entire site, www.tsolkas.gr), we come to the following conclusions:
1. The Theory of Relativity is pseudo-physics, and by no means does it express the natural reality.
2. The Theory of Relativity is the greatest scientific fallacy in the History of Physics.
3. The Theory of Relativity (as a completely false Theory of Physics) should cease to be taught in Universities, etc, right now, because there is no longer any point in teaching it; it is merely a waste of time and money, for no good reason, and the creative minds of many Physicists are being wasted on it.
4. Finally (because this phenomenon really is comi-tragic), I repeat, once again, that:
The Physicists of the future will laugh…!!! at today¢s “great” Physicists, who cannot (or do not want to) grasp such “simple facts” as those presented in paragraphs (A) and (B) of the above recapitulation.

This brings me to the end of this project. Time will tell whether I am right or wrong.

Copyright 2010: Christos A. Tsolkas                                            Agrinio, May 1st 2010